Ely

Ely v. Liscomb

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 103·24 Cal. App. 224·140 P. 1086
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 1, 1914Civ. No. 1380.California1,861 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Action to recover upon an undertaking given by defendants pursuant to the provisions of section 514 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Judgment went for plaintiff, from which defendants appeal.

In June, 1904, plaintiff brought suit in claim and delivery against Ben C. Williams and Forrest Flint for the possession of certain chattels, consisting of horses, vehicles, and other equipment of a livery stable, including a barn 75 by 120 feet in dimensions, which was erected upon a lot the use of which was leased therefor, and upon all of which plaintiff held a chattel mortgage executed by Williams and Flint, to foreclose which plaintiff had brought suit.

For the purpose of securing the return of the chattels Williams and Flint, defendants in that action, caused an undertaking executed by defendants herein, as prescribed by said section 514 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to be given the sheriff; whereupon he returned the property to defendants in said action.

On October 31,1904, the ease was tried, followed on November 17th by a decision for plaintiff, in whose favor judgment was entered on December 17th. The lease of the lot upon which the barn was erected, by its terms, expired…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.