Massie

Massie v. Elgadorado Gold Star Min. Co.

Good Law
36 Cal. App. 153·171 P. 814
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 1918Civ. No. 2035.California926 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

This appeal was taken by defendant from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. On the evidence as shown by the bill of exceptions, we are of the opinion that the judgment cannot be sustained; and it will be unnecessary to notice particularly errors assigned by appellant which do not refer to the question of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision of the court.

Plaintiffs sued upon two promissory notes alleged to have been executed by the defendant, each for the sum of five hundred dollars; the first alleged to be of date May 15, 1910, and the second of June 15, 1910, each payable one year after date, with interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum. It was alleged that plaintiffs were not in possession of the promissory notes at the time suit was brought, but that they were informed and believed that the same were in possession of the defendant. The defendant by answer specifically denied the making of the promissory notes and denied that it had possession of any notes. It appeared that at the time the notes were alleged to have been made one Sims was president of the defendant company. Plaintiff Lou Massie testified that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.