Walker

Walker v. Mason

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 361·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 449·293 P. 125
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 1930Docket No. 7405.California512 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

In an action for personal injuries tried before a jury the plaintiff recovered a verdict for $3,415. The defendant appeals from the judgment on typewritten transcripts.

Plaintiff was walking in a southerly direction across Market Street in San Francisco at the southeast intersection of Market and Third. At the same time defendant was driving a jitney bus in an easterly direction along Market. Plaintiff was struck by the right front fender of defendant’s car just as he reached a point about three feet from the southerly curb of Market Street.

Plaintiff plants his case on defendant’s negligence in failing to obey the “stop” signal for east-west traffic on Market Street. On this point there is a sharp conflict in the evidence, which the jury resolved in favor of plaintiff.

Defendant insists that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. The argument is based upon some evidence tending to show that plaintiff failed to look to his right as he crossed the street and on evidence tending to show that he stopped and backed into the oncoming car. On both points the evidence is in conflict and this court cannot say that plaintiff was guilty of contributory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.