Hill

Hill v. Waiting Mining Co.

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 109·87 Cal. App. 297·261 P. 1115
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 6, 1927Docket No. 6056.California1,286 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to obtain a decree quieting title to real estate. The defendants appeared and answered. The trial court made findings in favor of the defendants and from a judgment based thereon the plaintiff has appealed.

On September 5, 1907, Albert J. Caswell and wife, as the owners, and C. M. Jensen and Angus Matheson, executed a writing by which the owners granted “the parties of the second part permission to work for minerals” on the land in suit. It was further provided: “1st. If said parties of the second part succeeded in getting minerals in paying quantities the parties of the first part will give said parties of the second part a one-half interest in ten acres of above-described property, as an inlet to the vein and all profits shall be divided one-half to parties of the first part and one-half to parties of the second part after all expenses have been paid, one-half by parties of the first part and one-half by parties of the second part. 2nd. If said parties of the second part do not get the mineral in paying * quantities all expenses shall be paid by said parties of the second part without any cost whatsoever to said parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.