Matter of Application of June

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 100·30 Cal. App. 767·159 P. 452
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1916Crim. No. 359.California495 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

Petitioner was informed against by the district attorney of Sonoma County for the crime of obtaining money under false pretenses. Upon demurrer to the information the court made the following order, January 10, 1916: “This cause came on regularly for the defendant to plead. The district attorney and Phil Ware and R. L. Thompson, Esq., being present, it being agreed that defendant was present; Whereupon it is ordered by the court that the demurrer filed herein be and the same is hereby sustained, and the court directs that the district attorney may file a new information on the proceedings heretofore had, or any other proceedings that the district attorney may elect, as prescribed by section 1008 of the Penal Code.”

Pursuant to said order the district attorney procured the indictment of petitioner by the grand jury for the same offense as that charged in the information, and petitioner was thereupon arrested upon a bench warrant and taken into custody by the sheriff, and is now held in imprisonment thereunder.

Petitioner seeks his discharge by writ of habeas corpus on the ground that said order was insufficient to justify the district attorney to proceed further in the action,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.