Tatum

Erie City Iron Works v. Tatum

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 286·1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 52·82 P. 92
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 1905No. 4.California2,245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Plaintiff brought an action in 1895 against defendants, wherein it alleged that defendants were indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $735 for one No. 9 Economic boiler sold to defendants by plaintiff January 25, 1895. Defendants answered, and, besides denying said indebtedness, set up a counterclaim.

In the counterclaim, after alleging the copartnership of defendants, and that plaintiff was a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania engaged in the manufacture and sale of steam-engines, defendants alleged: “3. That on or about the 31st day of August, 1888, defendants purchased of plaintiff, and plaintiff sold and delivered to defendants a so-called automatic cut-off steam-engine for the sum of eight hundred and fifty-seven dollars, which said purchase price defendants paid plaintiff, and defendants also paid $120 freightage on said engine at time of its purchase, from Erie, Pennsylvania, to the Pacific Coast. 4. That defendants ordered said engine of plaintiff and purchased the same as a steam-engine that should be reasonably fit for the purpose of operating and running machinery, and plaintiff furnished the same to defendants as a steam-engine reasonably fit for such purpose; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.