Schweichler

People v. Schweichler

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 738·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 243·117 P. 939
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 1, 1911Crim. No. 155.California1,330 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

Appellant was convicted of perjury and sentenced to the penitentiary for the term of two years. The accusation was that, in an investigation before the election board of Princeton precinct, in the county of Colusa, at the general election on November 8, 1910, he testified falsely concerning his qualifications as a voter in said precinct. The portion of the information deemed sufficient for the purpose of discussion is as follows: “That thereupon at the time and place last aforesaid, the right of the defendant to vote at said election was duly challenged upon the ground that he, the said defendant, had not resided within the said precinct of Princeton the length of time prescribed by law in order that he might be entitled to vote at said election in said precinct. That the board of election of said Princeton precinct then and there having and had competent jurisdiction to hear, decide and determine said challenge and proceeding, and was then and there fully empowered t® administer the law in said challenge and proceeding; that it then and there became and was material to know in the determination of said challenge, whether or not the said defendant had been a resident of said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.