Warren

Warren v. Burch

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 469·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 704·289 P. 656
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 1930Docket No. 69.California1,148 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beaumont, J.

Plaintiff’s complaint is in two counts. The first alleges that defendant Charles E. Burch received the sum of $17,500 belonging to plaintiff and his assignors, which he agreed to pay them on demand, but that without authority he delivered the same to the other two defendants, M. E. Lyon and Imperial Live Stock and Mortgage Company. The second count alleges that Charles E. Burch was attorney of plaintiff and his assignors; that he, while acting as their attorney, received said sum of money for the use and benefit of plaintiff and his assignors; that, with the aid of defendant Lyon, he fraudulently appropriated it to his own use and to the use of defendants Lyon and Imperial Live Stock and Mortgage Company. Each count alleges demand was made on all defendants, but that payment was refused. In addition to the denials contained in the answer of each defendant, said Imperial Live Stock and Mortgage Company pleaded that plaintiff and his assignors had notice that the money in question was to be applied to the credit of George W. McCain and that there was no objection made thereto; that the money was so applied and that the Imperial Live Stock and Mortgage Company had delivered to said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.