Ephraim

People v. Ephraim

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 273·79 Cal. App. 713·250 P. 873
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 1926Docket No. 1262.California2,275 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

The defendant herein was found guilty of embezzlement and has appealed from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial, urging as grounds for reversal insufficiency of the evidence and misconduct of the district attorney.

The property alleged to have been embezzled was a promissory note for the payment of the sum of $500, signed by Morris Chernow and wife, and delivered to appellant in part payment of the purchase price for the sale to Chernow and one Belan of an apartment house business in Oakland, owned and operated by Mrs. Nellie Keaeh, the information charging that said note came into appellant’s possession as agent and bailee of Mrs. Keaeh and was by him fraudulently and feloniously appropriated to his own use. The fact that appellant received the note from Chernow is not controverted, nor is there any claim made that the same was not afterwards converted by appellant to his own use, but the ownership of said note is disputed. With respect thereto appellant contends that the evidence fails to establish any agency between himself and Mrs. Keaeh relating to the sale of her interests in said apartment house, but,' on the contrary, shows that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.