Coyle

People v. Coyle

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 869·81 Cal. App. 671·254 P. 597
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 1927Docket No. 1443.California1,064 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McLUCAS, J.

The information is in eight counts, four of which charged the defendant with the crime of grand larceny of certain stocks, and the other four counts charged the defendant with the crime of embezzlement of the identical stocks mentioned in the larceny counts. The jury returned a verdict acquitting the defendant on the four counts charging grand larceny, and finding the defendant guilty on the four counts charging embezzlement. The trial court pronounced judgment and sentenced the defendant on count VIII, while sentence was suspended on counts II, IV, and VI. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendant first urges that he is not guilty of the crime of embezzlement as charged in count VIII, and alleges that there is no proof of conversion of the Lincoln Mortgage Company stock as charged in said count, but that the defendant only carried out the instructions of the complaining witness, Mary Dwyer, in securing a loan on the stock used as col lateral, for the purpose of buying other stocks as authorized by the complaining witness.

Examination of the record discloses that Mary Dwyer first met the defendant in August, 1925, to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.