Sammon

Sammon v. Wing

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 689·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 731·288 P. 711
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 1930Docket No. 4098.California1,202 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

This is an action to foreclose the lien of a street improvement bond issued by the city of Santa Monica in the year 1926 under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730). The action was commenced September 6, 1927. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the relief demanded, except that nothing was allowed as attorney’s fee for the prosecution of the action, the plaintiff having made no demand for payment of the bond upon the owner or his agent prior to the commencement of the action. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment. There is no dispute as to the facts and the sole question presented by the appeal is whether, under the conceded facts, the plaintiff is entitled to recover any attorney’s fee. At the time the bond was issued section 27, included in part I of the act, provided for a suit by the contractor or his assignee against the owner of land assessed for an improvement to recover the amount of any delinquent assessment. That section further provided:

Part III of the act (section 59) authorizes the city council of a municipality to provide for the issuance of serial bonds “to represent assessments of twenty-five dollars or over for the cost of any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.