Kramer

Kramer v. Board of Police Commissioners

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 198·39 Cal. App. 396·179 P. 216
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 1919Civ. No. 2276.California1,734 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment directing the issuance of a writ of mandate requiring the defendants to reinstate the plaintiff and respondent herein as a police officer. The judgment followed an order overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended petition for such writ, the defendants declining to answer.

The facts, as presented in the plaintiff’s petition, are as follows: Prior to the month of August, 1906, the plaintiff was a regularly appointed and acting police officer of the city and county of San Francisco, but in that month, owing to conditions created by the earthquake and fire of that year, the board of police commissioners of said city and county suggested to certain members of the police department, the plaintiff being among the number, that they apply for leave of absence from the department without pay for the purpose of engaging temporarily in business, the object of this suggestion being to work a temporary reduction in the cost of maintaining the police department during the- critical period following the earthquake and fire. Acting upon this suggestion, the plaintiff applied for a leave of absence for three months, which was granted him, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.