Bradbury

Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Bradbury

Good Law
1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 165·3 Cal. App. 256·84 P. 1007
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 1906Civ. No. 146.California2,289 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The plaintiff seeks herein to recover from the defendant the sum of $625 for services rendered by Guy T. Wayman, his assignor, as the agent of the defendant for the sale of a parcel of land in San Francisco. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The facts as shown at the trial are that on October 14, 1902, the defendant, by an instrument in writing, employed Way-man as his sole and exclusive agent for the period of twenty days from that date to sell for him a certain parcel of land for the sum of $50,000, and at the same time executed to him another instrument, by which he promised to pay him a commission of one and one-quarter per cent of such purchase price if the property should be sold in accordance therewith. Wayman did not make a sale within said time, but. on November 7th he negotiated with Knickerbocker and Barker for a purchase of the lot by them, and received from them $500 as a deposit therefor, and on the same day stated to the defendant that he had sold the property to them, and presented to him an instrument signed by himself stating that he had “received from Knickerbocker $500, being a deposit on account of $50,000 for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.