Pinheiro

Pinheiro v. Bettencourt

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 111·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 112·118 P. 941
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 1911Civ. No. 764.California3,490 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

Action to quiet title. In his amended complaint plaintiff alleges ownership and possession of the E. ½ of the E. ½ of the N. E. ¼ of the N. E. ¼ of section 11, township 16 south, range 22 east, M. D. B. & M., “being ten acres of land more or less, and more particularly described and bounded as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said section eleven and running westerly along the north line of said section a distance of three hundred and twenty-six feet, thence southerly and parallel with the east line of said section a distance of thirteen hundred and twenty- two feet, thence easterly and parallel with the north line of said section á distance of three hundred and twenty-six feet to the east line of said section, thence north along said east line of said section a distance of thirteen hundred and twenty-two feet to the place of beginning”; alleges the payment of all taxes which have been assessed against said land; also alleges adverse possession since February 2, 1901, “as against all the world of all of the said land, except that defendants and each of them claim some right, title, interest or estate in and to, and possession of, that portion of said land particularly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.