Richmond

Richmond v. Moore

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 173·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 877·284 P. 681
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 1930Docket No. 7030.California2,503 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koford, J.

The above-named minor respondent and his parents obtained separate verdicts and judgments for damages for personal injuries received by the minor when struck by the automobile of appellant.

The points raised on appeal relate to the sufficiency of the proof, the examination of the jurors, rulings on the evidence and instructions to the jury.

The minor was eight years of age at the time of the accident. He was struck by the appellant’s automobile just after he had stepped off of the No. 32 street-car at its southerly and westerly terminus on the west side of Stanyan Street just north of Haight Street, San Francisco. The street-car had approached Haight Street from the north. The automobile came toward the street-ear from the south. The "minor left the street-car by the front or southerly platform of the street-ear and stepped off from the exit of the east side thereof, that being the only exit provided for him. According to the evidence relied upon by respondents, the minor was struck immediately upon stepping off the street-car and within two feet thereof. The appellant claims that the minor respondent suddenly rushed out from the street-car in a diagonal direction without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.