City of Redding v. County of Shasta

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 519·36 Cal. App. 48·171 P. 806
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1918Civ. No. 1790.California3,657 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

In the first cause of action it is alleged that defendant is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $28,-235.53 “for money paid out and expended by said plaintiff for the use and benefit of said defendant in the construction of a concrete bridge over and across the Sacramento Biver at Beid’s Ferry and in said City of Bedding and in said County of Shasta, and which said bridge crosses the line between said City of Bedding and Boad District Number Four (4) of said County of Shasta, and which said bridge connects and is a part of the public highway leading from and within said City of Bedding on the south bank of said Sacramento Biver to the public highway in Boad District No. 4 of said County of Shasta, leading from the north bank of said Sacramento Biver to the towns of Kennett, Buckeye, Baird in said • Shasta County and to other parts of said Shasta County for the purpose of transportation of persons and property and as a means of communication and for promoting the convenience of the public. That the' building and construction of said bridge as a part of and so connecting said public highway was necessary and essential for the use and convenience of the inhabitants of said City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.