Silman

Brinkley-Douglas Fruit Co. v. Silman

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 248·33 Cal. App. 643·166 P. 371·166 P.2d 371
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 10, 1917Civ. No. 1611.California3,380 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The action was originally _ brought by plaintiff against S. C. Cornell, as sheriff of Merced County, and the Title Company as surety on his official bond, for the conversion of 280 crates of sweet potatoes. After the action was commenced Cornell died and his administrator was substituted as defendant. The complaint is in the usual form for conversion. The answer denied the corporate existence of plaintiff, that plaintiff was ever the owner of the potatoes, and denied any conversion by Cornell. As a separate defense it was alleged that defendant Cornell, as sheriff, on February 26,1912, duly levied on said potatoes a writ of attachment issued out of the justice court in an action wherein F. H. Duarte was defendant, and at the time of said levy Duarte was the owner of and in the possession of said potatoes, and that they were afterward sold and the proceeds regularly applied to the satisfaction of the judgments obtained in that action and in another action against the same defendant. It was also alleged that the plaintiff herein never served upon defendant, Cornell, any notice of its claim to said potatoes prior to said sale, and plaintiff never at any time served upon Cornell any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.