Bricker

Bricker v. Banks

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 602·98 Cal. App. 87·276 P. 399
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 1929Docket No. 3789.California1,255 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the city clerk of Stockton to certify and file two petitions, one for the recall of a city councilman and the other for the recall of four other city councilmen, and to compel the city council to call a special election to determine whether the councilmen named in the petitions shall be recalled. The city clerk refused to certify and file either petition on the ground that in each of them the statement of the reasons for demanding the recall contained more than two hundred words and one of them on the further ground that it demanded the recall of four city councilmen.

The charter of the city of Stockton provides for the recall of elective officers thereof. Article XXVIII, section 2, relating to recall of officers provides: “The petition must contain a statement of the reasons for the demand.” (Stats. 1923, p. 1394.) Section 5 of the same article provides: “In the published call for the election there shall be printed in not more than two hundred words the reasons for demanding the recall of the officer as set forth in the recall petition.” Each petition involved herein contains nearly three hundred words in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.