Keck

Keck v. Wingert

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 475·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 356·23 P.2d 99
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 1933Docket No. 7754.California4,210 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Archbald, J.

Action by plaintiff to recover from defendants an alleged secret commission claimed to have been obtained by them in acting as agents for plaintiff in the leasing of certain prospective oil lands. From a judgment rendered against them defendants have appealed.

The contentions of appellants are many, but we think the material ones may well be summed up and considered as a claim that the findings are not supported by the evidence.

The findings state in substance that plaintiff was the owner of certain lands adjacent to the Santa Fe Springs oil-field; that defendant Wingert was an attorney and defendant Koon a licensed real estate broker; that Wingert and Koon entered into an agreement, which was in effect at all times mentioned, wherein and whereby Koon agreed to open up and operate a real estate and insurance office, to keep an itemized account of all operations and furnish Wingert with a monthly statement of such operations, and after deducting operating expenses the net profits were to be divided equally between the two; that Wingert on his part was to pay to Koon l$150 on the first day of each and every month; that plaintiff had no knowledge of such agreement; that Wingert was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.