Jansen

Jansen v. Jansen

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 294·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 404·15 P.2d 777
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 2, 1932Docket No. 8276.California1,542 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Parker, J.

The purpose of the action was to dissolve the bonds of matrimony theretofore and then existing between the parties. Plaintiff alleged extreme cruelty and failure to provide. Defendant denied the allegations of the complaint, seeking no affirmative relief. Certain allegations were made and denials thereto entered, which went to the character and amount of property held by the parties, of which mention will be made hereinafter. The trial court awarded to plaintiff an interlocutory decree of divorce upon the grounds of extreme cruelty, a nonsuit having been entered on the failure to provide count. The said decree further determined certain property to be community property and divided the same between the parties. After judgment defendant moved for a new trial which was denied. Prior to the hearing of the motion for a new trial and after notice of intention to move for a new trial the plaintiff noticed a motion to award her additional counsel fees to resist the said motion. Counsel fees were awarded plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order allowing the said counsel fees.

It is first contended by appellant that the evidence is insufficient to uphold the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.