Burrell

Burrell v. Southern California Canning Co.

Good Law
35 Cal. App. 162·169 P. 405
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 1917Civ. No. 2144.California904 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

Plaintiff, as assignee of a certain corporation known as the Anderson-Barngrover Manufacturing Company, brought this action against defendant to recover the price of certain machinery and mechanical appliances used in the canning of fruits, which were alleged to have been sold by the Anderson Company to defendant.

Three counts or causes of action are set forth in the complaint. The defendant admits the ordering and receipt of the goods, but by answer and counterclaim raises certain issues as to the performance of the contract, and claims damages for alleged breach of warranty in connection therewith in a sum greatly.in excess of the amount sued for.

The-trial was had by jury, which rendered both a general and a special verdict. The special verdict found in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $5,824.42 based upon the first count, the further sum of $4,427 under the second, and the sum of $708.39 upon the third count. It also found in favor of the defendant in the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars as damages for breach of warranty as to articles embraced in the second count, and this sum was deducted from the amount awarded plaintiff under the special verdict, and a general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.