Firth

Firth v. Richter

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 819·49 Cal. App. 545·196 P. 277
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 11, 1920Civ. No. 3353.California848 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Action to recover damages resulting from breach of warranty. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

The action is based upon a. contract dated February 28, 1912, which, as written, was entered into between the defendant as party of the first part and. E. J. Wilson and J. P. Firth as parties of the second part. It was provided therein “that the party of the first part agrees to sell and the parties of the second part agree to buy nine hundred and ninety-six (996) Valencia orange trees, running in size y2 inch and up, said trees grown by O. M. Bert, near his pumping plant. Price to be paid for trees, One, twenty-five cents ($1.25) f. o. b. trees to be balled and scrubbed and defoliated delivered f. o. b. in good condition and to pass inspection before shipping.” It will be noted that the action is brought by Firth and Wilson and by George H. Bradley as copartners. It was alleged in the complaint that the plaintiffs are, and at all times mentioned therein were, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of the Dry Bog Orange Company, and that they had filed with the county clerk of Tulare County the certificate required by sections 2466 and 2468 of the Civil Code, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.