Boyles

Boyles v. Leonardo

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 613·65 Cal. App. 315·224 P. 115
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 1924Civ. No. 4442.California1,167 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The action was brought to recover a judgment for attorney fees which the plaintiff alleged were performed by his assignors for the plaintiff in a certain divorce ease commenced by the defendant. The trial court awarded the plaintiff a decree and the defendant has appealed therefrom.

Prior to May 23, 1921, Joseph J. Leonardo and Mary Leonardo had been husband and wife. Either as his separate property in part, or as community property at least in part, they were at that time possessed of a number of pieces of property of considerable value. Some of those properties were in Portugal and some were in California. Prior to the date last mentioned Mary Leonardo called on plaintiff’s assignors, complained to them that her husband was in the habit of brutally beating and whipping her, and consulted them as to her rights. Mr. Donahue at first took charge of the matter and commenced a series of conversations in which he attempted to settle the troubles existing between the Leonardos. Failing in that effort, a further conference took place between him and Mrs. Leonardo. At that time it was determined to commence the divorce case. Mr. Donahue testified that at that time he stated the fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.