Gray

Gray v. Fred B. Neuhoff Co.

Good Law
124 Cal. App. 567·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 740·12 P.2d 1036
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 1932Docket No. 4498.California6,000 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The plaintiffs in this action had judgment- for the recovery of two installments in the total sum of $35,000, being a part of the purchase price of certain real property situate in the city of Lodi, upon which there was then and there standing a canning factory, including all machinery and equipment therein and belonging thereto, save and except a few specified articles. From this judgment the defendant appeals, and upon this appeal contends : 1. That the contract price, or that the amount of the two unpaid installments did not and do not constitute the proper measure of damages; 2. That the contract was not authorized by the defendant; in other words, that the con tract apparently executed by the company is not in fact the contract of the corporation; 3. That no proper offer was made by the plaintiff to deliver possession; 4. That the contract was obtained by the fraudulent representations of one Williams as to the freight rate between the cities of San Francisco and Lodi; 5. That the plaintiff made some fraudulent representations regarding the boilers, a part of the equipment of the canning plant; 6. That there was a parol agreement to restore the plant after the spinach pack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.