Poshard

Poshard v. Parkford

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 696·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1097·19 P.2d 275
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 1933Docket No. 4742.California2,266 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The plaintiff had judgment against the defendants for the sum of $823.68 and costs of suit. From this judgment the defendants appeal.

The record shows that in 1922 the defendant Parkford purchased 16 lots in the Santa Fe Oil Field; that following the purchase of said property the defendant Parkford instituted a sales campaign for the sale of twenty-five per cent of the oil which should be developed in and extracted from such field. The twenty-five per cent was divided into 2,000 parts, and of these the plaintiff became the owner of twenty-four; that is to say, the plaintiff in this action was and is the owner of 24/2000ths of one-fourth of the oil produced from the lots purchased by the defendant Parkford.

Following the sale of the 2,000 parts representing twenty-five per cent of the oil that should be produced of and from the lots purchased by the defendant Parkford, the defendant Parkford drilled four wells upon the premises, only two of which produced oil. Following the sale of the 2,000 parts representing twenty-five per cent of the oil that should be produced of and from the lots purchased by Parkford, an agreement was entered into that the money received from the sale of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.