Humburg

Humburg v. Lotz

Good Law
1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 132·4 Cal. App. 438·88 P. 510
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 23, 1906Civ. No. 262.California1,781 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The facts, as shown by the findings and the evidence, are substantially as follows: Defendant is a brother of Augustus Lotz, who was, during the years 1903 and 1904, the president of the “Sanitary Compressed Air and Suction Dust Removing Company,” a corporation doing business in California, and which was at the times herein named the owner of certain letters patent for certain automatic air dust removing and cleaning devices, and portable wagons, used in its business. In the early part of the year 1903 the said corpora tion agreed with defendant that he should have the exclusive right to purchase and sell the said letters patent, and the devices and portable wagon in connection therewith, in the territory covered by the county of Santa Clara, for the sum of $8,000, out of which defendant was to be paid a commission of $3,000, making the net price to defendant of $5,000, and this arrangement was in force at all the times the defendant was negotiating with plaintiff. Plaintiff and defendant had known each other .for many years, and during such time had been upon friendly terms, and plaintiff had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.