Stone v. San Francisco Brick Co.

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 203·1910 Cal. App. LEXIS 206·109 P. 103
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 11, 1910Civ. No. 668.California1,316 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover the sum of $854 as the reasonable value of work and labor performed for and materials furnished to defendant by plaintiff’s assignor, at the special instance and request of defendant.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for the. sum of $500, from which and the order denying its motion for a new trial defendant appealed to this court.

The action was commenced by the filing of the complaint on the eighteenth day of May, 1907, which alleged the performance of the work, etc., within two years last past. The findings were signed and filed on the twenty-first day of May, 1908. The court, following the language of the complaint, found “That within two years last past, at the City and County of San Francisco, said Union Machine Company performed work, labor and services for said defendant corporation at its special instance and request, in making and repairing various kinds of machinery and metal appliances, and during said time said Union Machine Company furnished materials to defendant in and for said work on the like request.”

This finding is attacked by appellant as not supported by the evidence and as evasive and not responsive to the issues presented by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.