Torchia

Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Torchia

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 21·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 575·288 P. 810
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1930Docket No. 4108.California2,839 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The plaintiff in this action appeals from a judgment entered in the above-entitled cause denying other than injunctive relief, wherein the plaintiff sought, under the provisions of section 1109 of the Civil Code, to have declared forfeited the title to certain real property located in the city of Los Angeles, particularly described as lot 1 in block 5 of Kendall’s Berry Tract, and to obtain a reconveyance thereof.

The transcript shows that on and prior tó June 13, 1915, the plaintiff was the owner of the above-described land, and on said date executed and delivered a deed thereto to Annie May Marston. This deed of conveyance contained the following limitations and conditions:

The deed further provided that the condition subsequent above specified should expire on the first day of January, 1930.

The title to the above lot was, on the twenty-fifth day of April, 1922, transferred to the defendants Edward D. Torchia and Bridget Torchia, who were in possession of said premises at the date of the institution of this action.

Subsequent to acquiring title the defendants Torchia engaged in two separate and distinct lines of transaction, one of which was found by the court to be in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.