Nichols

Nichols v. Sunderland

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 435·77 Cal. App. 627·247 P. 614
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 1926Docket No. 5637.California4,152 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The petitioner was a police officer of the city of Fresno. On or about the seventh day of November, 1925, the petitioner, together with eleven other police officers of the city of Fresno, was indicted by the federal grand jury, charged with the crime of conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act. On November 9, 1925, the respondent A. E. Sunderland, Commissioner of Public Welfare and head of the police department, delivered to the petitioner a writing in words and figures as follows, to wit:

Since that date the petitioner has not been recognized by said respondent nor assigned to any duty whatsoever. Thereafter, on the .twelfth day of November, 1925, the petitioner served on said respondent a written answer demanding a hearing and thereupon both writings were delivered to the Civil Service Commission of Fresno. The matter was set for hearing and before the day appointed for the hearing the petitioner requested in writing that the matter be continued indefinitely by the Civil Service Board. The request was granted. After petitioner’s trial in the federal court was concluded about February 1, 1926, said respondent filed and served on the petitioner a writing in words and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.