Hammond

Hammond v. Hammond

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 776·92 Cal. App. 212·267 P. 893
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 1928Docket No. 5045.California1,066 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

This is an action for divorce on the grounds of wilful neglect and extreme cruelty. No evidence was introduced upon the latter cause of action. An order to show cause was issued against the defendant, but thereafter a stipulation was entered into by and between the parties, through their attorneys, that such order might be set aside, which was done. The defendant did not plead to the complaint, and after expiration of the legal time counsel for plaintiff requested the clerk to enter his default. The record before us does not disclose whether or not the clerk ever entered the default, but we take it that he did, inasmuch as the case was set down for hearing as a default case and counsel in their briefs treat the case as though the default had been regularly entered. After plaintiff had put on her case the trial judge, noticing the defendant in court, called him to the witness-stand. To this plaintiff’s counsel entered an objection upon the ground that such proceeding was incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial. The objection was overruled and the court proceeded to examine defendant. The examination elicited testimony tending to prove the support of plaintiff by defendant, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.