May

May v. Craig

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 368·109 P. 842
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 1910Civ. No. 844.California463 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

Plaintiff by his complaint sought a writ of mandate to compel the board of public works of Long Beach, a charter city, to issue to him a permit for the construction of a certain building by him proposed to be erected within such city. This permit, it is alleged, the board refused to issue, assigning as the sole reason that the plans and specifications intended to control in the erection and construction of such building did not conform to and comply with the requirements of the act of April 16, 1909. (Laws 1909, p. 948.) It is further alleged that the plans and specifications which were presented did conform in every respect to the ordinances of the city regularly enacted with reference to the construction of buildings within such city. It is admitted in the complaint that such plans did not comply with all of the requirements of the general law. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint, which was sustained ivithout leave to amend, and judgment Avent for defendants, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

It is appellant’s contention that all matters with reference to the size and character of buildings constructed or to be constructed within the limits of a charter city, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.