Smith v. Superior Court

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 65·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 13·27 P.2d 935
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 26, 1933Docket No. 9493.California367 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is a petition for rehearing, after denial by this court of a petition for writ of review of a judgment of the superior court entered on appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles.

The judgment of the municipal court was rendered in an action arising out of a contract between the parties to that action. The judgment was to the effect “that the plaintiff have judgment against Horne’s Zoological Arena Company in the sum of $187.50, and that the said judgment be satisfied only in merchandise and not in money”. The petition for writ of review herein is directed against the judgment of the superior court affirming said judgment of the municipal court. In support of the petition for writ of review it was contended by petitioner that the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter a judgment payable in goods only, and that the superior court exceeded its jurisdiction in affirming such judgment. We denied the petition for a writ of review because we were of the opinion that the superior court, as a court of appeal, had jurisdiction either to reverse or to affirm the judgment. Also, it appeared on the face of the petition that the municipal court did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.