Ex Parte Weiler

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 485·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 702·289 P. 645
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 1930Docket No. 1579.California977 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

Formerly A. '¡Tudson Weiler, the petitioner, and Helen C. Weiler were husband and wife. They entered into a formal written contract settling their property rights. Later, Mrs. Weiler applied for divorce. Among other things she pleaded “that prior to the commencement of this action, by a written agreement, plaintiff and said defendant settled and adjusted between themselves their respective rights in and to all community property of said marriage, which said settlement plaintiff hereby requests the court to approve and confirm.” In her complaint she did not pray for counsel fees, costs or maintenance. The husband allowed his default to be taken. In the interlocutory decree the trial court inserted the following: “It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that this court does hereby approve and confirm and make a part of this decree the provisions of that certain property settlement agreement made and entered into between the parties hereto and executed by them on the 15th day of May, 1928.” In the final decree that order was repeated. The defendant failed to make some of the payments provided in the written agreement and so adopted by the trial court. A motion was duly and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.