Hill

Hill v. Peres

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 132·1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 901·28 P.2d 946
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 1934Docket No. 8809.California3,511 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ogden, J.

This is an action for damages brought by the administrator of her estate for the death of Johanna Hill, which is claimed to have resulted from the negligence of both appellants. The cause was tried with a jury, which returned its verdict against both appellants in the sum of $15,000. Both appellants have separately appealed from the judgment entered thereon, each contending that he was not negligent and that even though negligent his negligence was not a proximate cause of the death.

About 10 o’clock P. M., on the evening of January 2'4, 1932, the deceased was riding in the front seat of a Ford coach automobile with her husband, who was driving, her three children riding in the rear seat. As they were proceeding in an easterly direction along Cutting Boulevard, in the city of Richmond, a collision occurred between the automobile in which they were riding and an Auburn sedan automobile proceeding in the opposite (westerly) direction operated by appellant Peres. At the point where the accident occurred, and for a considerable distance in both directions, Cutting Boulevard is a level, broad highway, being sixty-one feet from curb to curb and paved for the entire width. It runs in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.