Lapique

Lapique v. Monroe

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 253·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 48·125 P. 760
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 14, 1912Civ. No. 1103.California351 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

The first cause of action is one for malicious prosecution; that is to say, the matters alleged approach more nearly a statement of a cause of action of that character than of any other. In substance, it is alleged that certain of defendants conspired together to charge and prosecute plaintiff for a public offense of which he alleges he is innocent. He was, however, bound over by the magistrate, tried by a jury and convicted, which judgment was subsequently reversed by this court. A second cause of action is attempted to be stated under section 1505 of the Penal Code, which section provides a penalty if a judge, after proper application, refuses to grant an order for a writ of habeas corpus, or if the officer to whom it is. directed refuses obedience thereto. Various persons, including the sheriff and his official bondsmen, and ministerial officers of the court are made parties to this second cause of action. The writ was issued and no disobedience of same is made to appear. Another attempted cause of action is against the superior judge and officers of the court connected with his trial and conviction, claiming that he was improperly convicted by reason of perjury on the part of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.