James

James v. San Jose Mercury News, Inc.

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 4th 1·20 Cal. Rptr. 2d 890
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1933Docket No. H009444.California7,861 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 3 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 4 OPINION Aram B. James, an attorney employed by a county public defender's office, sued a newspaper and one of its employees for libel. The employee, acting as a bylined columnist for the newspaper, had written, and the newspaper had printed, a column which named James in the context of a discussion of asserted violations of law by defense attorneys in criminal cases involving child victims. The defendants moved for summary judgment. The motion was granted and judgment was entered for the defendants. James appeals. We shall affirm the judgment. The basic facts are not disputed. James had been assigned to defend an individual accused of felonies, including attempted sexual molestation, allegedly committed against three children. In the course of trial preparation James asked a public defender's investigator to subpoena the school records of the victims. His subsequently stated purpose was "[t]o determine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.