Masonic Temple Ass'n v. Stockholders Auxiliary Corp.

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 234·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 928·19 P.2d 865
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 1933Docket No. 4690.California1,197 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for costs incurred in restoring to its original condition demised premises after the termination of a lease. The interior of the building which is situated on the leased premises was altered by the lessee pursuant to an agreement to restore the property to its original condition at the expiration of the lease. The appellant claims that the obligation to restore the premises is conditioned upon its exercise of an option to renew the lease for an additional five-year term. The option was not exercised. The appellant refused to restore the building. This suit depends upon the construction of the agreement under which the building was remodeled.

The plaintiff, a corporation, owns lot 5 and the east twenty feet of lot 6, in a block bounded by I and J and Eleventh and Twelfth Streets in Sacramento. September 11, 1923, the plaintiff executed a five-year lease of a portion of this lot, together with the building which is situated thereon, to the Bancitaly Corporation, for $150 rental per month, to be used for the purpose of conducting a banking business. This lease was immediately assigned to the defendant corporation. By written consent of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.