Moore Grocery Co. v. Los Angeles Nut House

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 440·90 Cal. App. 792·266 P. 583
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 11, 1928Docket No. 5083.California635 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Valentine, J.

This was an action for damages for breach of contract. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff for $1,500 and costs, and from this judgment defendants appeal.

Respondent contends that, upon the record presented, none of the appellants’ contentions can be considered because the reporter’s transcript on file is not properly authenticated in that it was not certified by the trial judge as required by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The case at bar was tried and decided and the findings and judgment signed by Hon. George P. Buck, a judge of the superior court of San Joaquin County, sitting temporarily in department 24 of the superior court in Los Angeles County, who then returned to San Joaquin County. A motion for a new trial was made in said department 24 and heard by Hon. Walter Guerin, whose regular department it was. Subsequently defendants appealed and noticed the settlement of the reporter’s transcript before the said Judge Guerin in said department 24, whereupon the following entry was made in the clerk’s minutes: “Moore Grocery Co. vs. L. A. Nut House, et al. Case Called. Hunsaker, Britt & Cosgrove by A. L. Keister appearing for pltff. and E. P. Gerecht by phone…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.