Fowler

Fowler v. Lane Mortgage Co.

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 136·58 Cal. App. 66·207 P. 919
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 1, 1922Civ. No. 3816.California1,390 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Basing his right so to do upon the provisions of section 707 of the Code of Civil Procedure, plaintiff, as the purchaser of a tract of land at judicial sale, brought this action to recover from defendant as tenant for the use and occupation of the same during the period fixed for the redemption thereof. He had judgment, from which defendant has appealed.

The complaint contains two counts, in one of which it is alleged that defendant as tenant was in possession and control of the land; and in the other, that O. T. Sutton farmed the same under an agreement to pay defendant for the use thereof a part of the crop, the value of which so paid was $1,965.47.

It appears from the pleadings, stipulation of facts, and meager evidence offered that on April 1, 1917, and at all times thereafter referred to, George L. Cooper was the owner of record of tract 58, township 13 south, range 15 east, S. B. M., in Imperial County, subject to a deed of trust whereby the same was conveyed to Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank to secure the payment of a loan made to him by Lane Mortgage Company; that on said date he executed a lease of said property to defendant, the term of which, as expressed therein,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.