Fall

Fall v. Lincoln Mortgage Co.

Good Law
115 Cal. App. 651·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 758·2 P.2d 58
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 1931Docket No. 4289.California1,720 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jamison, J.

This is an action for money had and received. Defendant answered denying the allegations of the complaint and setting up the provisions of sections 337, subdivision 1, 338, subdivision 4, and 339, subdivision 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure in bar of the plaintiff’s cause of action.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendant moved for a nonsuit, which the court did not pass upon until after defendant had produced his evidence and after the evidence of both plaintiff and defendant was all in. Thereupon the court granted the motion for a nonsuit and rendered judgment in favor of defendant. From this judgment plaintiff has appealed.

In December, 1922, the corporation commissioner issued a permit to respondent to sell a certain number of its shares of capital stock and this action grew out of a subscription by appellant for 2,000 shares of the preferred and common stock so authorized to be sold.

The contention of appellant is that he has the right to recover the money for which he sues upon two grounds: 1. Failure of consideration in that appellant failed to advance the price' of units as agreed; 2. Because of the violation of the provisions of the Corporate Securities Act,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.