Palladine

Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 649·65 Cal. App. 727·225 P. 291
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 1924Civ. No. 4421.California10,342 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finlayson, J.

This is an action to recover damages for fraudulent representations made in the sale of a section of land in the Imperial Valley, hereafter referred to as section 13. The case was tried before a jury. A judgment of nonsuit was entered in favor of the defendant Janss Investment Company. A verdict in the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars was returned against the defendants Imperial Valley Farm Lands Association and H. H. Clark, both of whom have appealed from the judgment.

The following outline of some of the principal facts will suffice for an understanding of the points to be discussed: The defendant Clark is the general manager at Calipatria of the Imperial Valley Farm Lands Association—hereafter referred to as the Association. The Association owned some forty-seven thousand acres of land in the Imperial Valley which it desired to sell. It inserted an advertisement in a Los Angeles newspaper advertising the lands for sale. It likewise caused to be published a printed folder which contained a map of the lands and certain information respecting the properties. In this folder the Association made certain representations, of. a more or less general nature, respecting the character…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.