Schutzer

Schutzer v. Taylor

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 37·40 Cal. App. 322·180 P. 660
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 1919Civ. No. 2857.California403 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in an action for damages for the conversion of personal property, and is taken on the judgment-roll alone.

The defendant in an amended answer alleged two distinct matters of defense. To the second of those defenses the trial court sustained a general demurrer, and it is upon the action of the court in this and one other matter that the defendant bases his appeal.

In the so-called second matter of defense the defendant alleges that Michael C. Taylor, his testator, was fraudulently induced to contribute to the support of Emma Onken during his lifetime, and was also fraudulently led to believe that unless he made some provision for her after his death she would be in want of the common necessaries of life; that accordingly he caused a certificate for sixteen shares of the capital stock of the Spring Valley Water Company (which is the property here in dispute) to be issued in the name of Emma Onken, with the understanding that the title and possession thereof were to remain in him until his death, when said shares of stock were to become the property of said Onken; that upon the issuance of said certificate it was delivered to said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.