Lane Manufacturing Co. v. Raymond Granite Co.

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 634·25 P.2d 1018
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 1933Docket No. 9105.California776 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiff sued on an express contract for the sale of certain machinery parts for use upon a rotary stone saw and upon an implied contract for freight paid for parts shipped by defendant to plaintiff. The defendant had judgment.

The complaint alleged: “That said machinery or parts of machinery above mentioned were ordered by the defendant for the purpose of replacing the trucks, boxes, glands and axles at that time in use upon the said Parker rotary stone saw. The said defendant agreed to pay for the said machinery so ordered at the time that the old parts which were to be replaced' as aforesaid had been repaired and placed back on said Parker rotary stone saw by the said defendant and did represent that said replacement of said parts would be within a period of one (1) year.”

On August 18, 1925, these parts were shipped to defendant but were not used until some time in the year 1928. On May 14, 1928, the defendant shipped the old parts to plaintiff, freight charges collect. The plaintiff paid the freight and this amount, added to the invoice price of the new parts, fixes the sum sued for.

In its answer the defendant denied that it had represented to plaintiff that the old…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.