Kemble

Busch Pipe & Supply Co. v. Kemble

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 881·92 Cal. App. 679·268 P. 725
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 1928Docket No. 3546.California1,398 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

Plaintiff brought the above-entitled actions to foreclose liens claimed by it for materials alleged to have been sold to the defendant Comstock & Howard and used by that corporation, as contractor, in the construction of buildings at Arrowhead Lake for the defendants Kemble and Arrowhead Lake Company, respectively. The two cases were tried together on the same evidence and separate judgments were entered in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for. Separate appeals have been taken from the judgments, the defendants, Arrowhead Lake Company and Title Insurance and Trust Company being the appellants in both cases. The record on appeal is contained in a single transcript and both appeals have been argued together.

Comstock & Howard was a corporation. All of its capital stock except one share was owned by C. G. Comstock, F. W. Howard, and MacNeal Swasey. Prior to the sale of the materials for which the plaintiff claims a lien, Comstock & Howard had entered into contracts with Kemble and Arrowhead Lake Company, respectively, for the construction of the buildings in question, which' involved large expenditures of money. “They handled the jobs on a percentage contract.” Howard testified that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.