Antognini

Antognini v. Grandi Co.

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 243·89 Cal. App. 628·265 P. 378
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 1928Docket No. 3428.California6,957 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The plaintiffs above named, each having identical causes of action against the defendant, filed their separate complaints, to which the defendant filed answers, and upon the trial both actions were tried at the same time, upon the same testimony, and are submitted to us upon one record. The plaintiffs were awarded judgment in their respective actions, and the defendant appeals. The complaints are alike, except as to the amount sued for, the plaintiff Antognini praying for judgment in the sum of $15,000, and the plaintiff Farrell prosecuting his action for the recovery of a judgment in the sum of $20,000. Each complaint alleges that in the month of July, 1921, the defendant corporation represented to the plaintiff that its capital stock was reasonably worth, and that it had a book value of, $125 per share. That said representations were made to each plaintiff for the purpose of inducing the purchase by each plaintiff of the capital stock of the defendant corporation. Each complaint sets forth that the plaintiff named therein relied upon and believed the representations so made to him, and in reliance thereupon purchased stock in said defendant corporation, the plaintiff Antognini…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.