Hutchinson

Bank of Venice v. De Luna Hutchinson

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 219·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 57·125 P. 252
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 1912Civ. No. 1091.California836 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

The action was against defendant and appellant as guarantor of a promissory note, and was originally brought against Susan N. de Luna, under which name and style she executed the contract of guaranty. The complaint was filed August 1, 1908. Defendant and appellant appeared thereto and subsequently, on December 14, 1908, filed her answer, setting forth, among other things, that she was a married woman; that her husband’s name was W. C. Hutchinson, and that her husband was absent from his home temporarily, but that the parties were not living separate and apart. Thereupon plaintiff asked for and obtained leave of court to amend its complaint, alleging the marriage, the husband’s name, and asking that he be made a party to said proceeding. This was pursuant to a stipulation, which further agreed that the answer theretofore filed might stand as an answer to the amended complaint. This amendment to the complaint and the stipulation were filed on June 3, 1909. The court by its order made October 13, 1909, directed the issuance of an alias summons. The original summons was returned and filed November 12, 1909. Thereafter an affidavit for publication of summons was filed, which set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.