Ansbach

Ansbach v. Department of Industrial Relations

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 647·99 Cal. App. 677·279 P. 224
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1929Docket No. 6509.California1,388 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Houser, J.

Certiorari. Somewhat condensed, the history of the present proceeding before this court is that in the course of his employment petitioner was injured; for which injury, at the instance of the employer and the insurance carrier, petitioner regularly received medical and surgical treatment. Some months after the happening of the accident which caused the injury, and pursuant to the direction of the employer and the insurance carrier, in an attempt to further relieve the employee from the effects of the injury received by him, by reason of the alleged malpractice of the attendant surgeon, petitioner received injuries which greatly added to his infirmities. Thereafter, on application made by petitioner to the respondent tribunal, the compensation to which petitioner was entitled under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act (Stats. 1917, p. 831, as variously amended) was adjusted.

By the terms of section 26 of said act a claim for compensation from the employer has no effect upon the right of the employee to an action for damages arising out of his injury against any person other than the employer; but where judgment is so recovered against such “third…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.