Terry

Terry v. Lesem

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 235·89 Cal. App. 682·265 P. 523
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 1928Docket No. 5819.California1,562 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

The plaintiff, whose true name is Eva Sophia Lesem, is an unmarried woman and is a daughter of the defendant. “Edith Terry” is a name assumed by the plaintiff and is the name under which she acquired any interest she may have in the property involved in this action.

In her complaint plaintiff alleges that she is, and ever since January 8, 1923, has been the owner of lot nine of block eleven, in the Beverly Tract, in the county of Los Angeles, and that the defendants, without right, claim an interest or estate therein adversely to the plaintiff. As defendant Short disclaimed any interest adverse to plaintiff, we shall treat the case as, if Mrs. Lesem were sole defendant. A second cause of action alleged that plaintiff made, but did not deliver, a deed of conveyance of said lot to the defendant; that the defendant, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent, took possession of said deed and caused the same to be recorded; that said deed, ,so wrongfully obtained, is a cloud upon plaintiff’s title.

Upon issues presented by said complaint and appellant’s answer thereto, and after an extended trial, the court made findings and entered its decree in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.