Zagoren

Zagoren v. Superior Court

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 548·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 514·4 P.2d 279
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 1931Docket No. 4501.California1,513 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Preston, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The facts are briefly these: On the second day of May, 1922, Henrietta de Bach Myers was, by an order of the Superior Court in and for the County of Sacramento, appointed administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, L. W. Myers. Mrs. Myers duly qualified and continued to act as administratrix of her husband’s estate until June 19, 1925, when she was permitted by the court to resign. The California Trust and Savings Bank, a corporation, was appointed by the court administrator of said estate in her place and stead.

The California Trust and Savings Bank immediately qualified and took over the administration of said estate and continued to act as administrator until on or about January 20, 1931, when it resigned. Louis J. Myers was thereafter appointed administrator of said estate and is now the duly appointed, qualified and acting administrator of said estate.

From the fourth day of November, 1923, to June 4, 1929, George L. Popert and petitioner, H. W. Zagoren, were the regularly employed attorneys for Mrs. Myers and the California Trust and Savings Bank in all matters connected with the administration of said estate. Said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.