Bowman

Bowman v. Provident Realty Investment Co.

Good Law
40 Cal. App. 115·180 P. 18
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1919Civ. No. 2744.California1,143 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Defendant S. C. Pratt appeals from an order denying his motion to recall and quash a writ of execution issued upon a judgment theretofore rendered against him in favor of Henrietta Paul Bowman.

The motion was based upon the conceded fact that subsequent to the rendition of said judgment Pratt was duly adjudged a bankrupt by the United States district court and, in October, 1916, an order was duly made for his discharge as such. The judgment was included in Pratt’s schedule of liabilities, and Bowman’s claim based thereon allowed in February, 1917. Thereafter, in October, 1917, the clerk of the superior court, as requested by the judgment creditor, issued an execution on the judgment, which was followed by Pratt’s motion and an order denying the same.

[1] That appellant’s discharge as a bankrupt released him from all liability upon the judgment must be conceded, unless the indebtedness falls within the exception specified in subdivision 2 of section 17 of the Federal Bankruptcy Act, [U. S. Comp. Stats. (1916), sec. 9601, 1 Fed. Stats. Ann., 2d ed., pp. 708, 716], which provides that “A discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all of his provable debts, except such as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.